Evidence · Original publications
Historical reports and source archive
Selected reports on patient protection, professional oversight, complaints, safeguarding and organisational learning.
Some of these reports are hard to find today. We want to keep them available and explain what each one says. We keep the original documents unchanged and identify who wrote them and when.
Who was the Commission for Health Improvement (CHI)?
CHI was an independent public organisation set up to check the quality and safety of care in the National Health Service (NHS). It inspected NHS organisations, investigated serious failures and published reports explaining what needed to improve. CHI looked at how healthcare systems worked. It was not the police and did not decide whether an individual doctor could keep practising.
CHI was replaced by the Healthcare Commission in 2004. In 2009, the Care Quality Commission (CQC) took over the Healthcare Commission’s work in England. CHI no longer exists, but its reports remain important evidence about problems patients faced and what was recommended at the time.
Below are two original CHI reports from 2001 and 2004. Each has an introduction explaining why it matters and what we can—and cannot—conclude from it.
The original 2001 and 2004 Commission for Health Improvement reports are preserved here unchanged under their stated non-commercial reproduction terms, with source and copyright information. The 2007 government response is linked to its official copy; permission to republish the complete facsimile has not been established. Privacy and website information
CHI report: Investigation into issues arising from the case of Loughborough GP Peter Green (2001)
An investigation into complaints and warnings about Peter Green, a general practitioner (GP), or family doctor. It shows how concerns were missed or not joined together, and what CHI recommended to protect patients.
CHI: Lessons from CHI Investigations 2000–2003 (2004)
Looks at lessons from several investigations, including the Green case. It discusses why services failed and what CHI said had started to change.
Safeguarding Patients: government response to the Shipman and other inquiries (2007)
Explains how the government responded to major inquiries and what changes it planned to protect patients. This is not the original Shipman Inquiry Fifth Report.
Shipman Inquiry: Fifth Report (2004)
Safeguarding Patients: Lessons from the Past — Proposals for the Future. This is a priority preservation candidate, but the complete original was not verified in the release package.
Healthcare Commission: Learning from Investigations (2008)
A later investigation report from the Healthcare Commission, which replaced CHI. We have not yet verified a complete original copy for this archive.
AHRQ source record — currently inaccessible from the UK (403). A PDF has been requested from CQC (30 October 2026).
The King's Fund: The NHS Improvers (2004)
An independent look at CHI’s work. We link to the publisher’s copy because we have not confirmed permission to host it ourselves.
Using this archive
Each report page explains which points come from the original publisher and which are PSS’s own comments. The publisher’s name and copyright notice stay with the original document. We do not alter historical reports or present them as PSS investigations.
This is a selected collection, not every report on the topic. Similar problems appearing years later do not prove that an older recommendation was ignored. See Then and now for the provisional comparison.
Research snapshot · 30 October 2026 · Independent project
